Skip to main content

Table 5 Distribution of overall extrahepatic regional lymphnodal metastases of HCC on FDG PET CT in 56 patients

From: Extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma on 18F FDG PET CT

Lymphnodal Involvement

n(%)

Size range (cm)

FDG + ve

FDG−ve

SUVmax range (gm/ml)

Nec

Non-Nec

Periceliac

6(10.7%)

< 1 cm–3.2 cm

3 (5.3%)

3(5.3%)

2–6.1

1 (1.7%)

5 (8.9%)

Periportal

8(14.2%)

1 cm–4.7 cm

5 (8.9%)

3 (5.3%)

6–13.6

0 (0%)

8 (14.2%)

Porta hepatis

5(8.9%)

< 1 cm–3 cm

4 (7.1%)

1(1.7%)

4–7.9

0(0%)

5 (8.9%)

Paraaortic

13(23.21%)

< 1 cm–3.3 cm

10 (17.8%)

3 (5.3%)

2.3–11.2

1(1.7%)

12 (21.4%)

Portocaval

12(21.4%)

< 1 cm–4.7 cm

6 (10.7%)

6 (10.7%)

3.8–13.6

0(0%)

12 (21.4%)

Peripancreatic

4 (7.1%)

1.2 cm–5.7 cm

3 (5.3%)

1 (1.7%)

4.2–10.5

0(0%)

4 (7.1%)

Aortocaval

14(25%)

< 1 cm–5.5 cm

11 (19.6%)

3 (5.3%)

2.4–11.5

0(0%)

14 25.0%)

Retrocaval

4 (7.1 %)

< 1 cm–1.8 cm

3 (5.3%)

1 (1.7%)

6.8–9.6

1(1.7%)

4 (7.1%)*

L eft Gastric

10(17.8%)

< 1 cm–2.5 cm

8 (14.2%)

2 (3.5%)

2.1–6.7

1(1.7%)

9 (16.0%)

Pericaval

3(5.3%)

1.6 cm– 9 cm

2 (3.5%)

1 (1.7%)

4.2–5.6

0(0%)

3 (5.3%)

Retrocrural

3(5.3%)

1.1 cm–2 cm

3 (5.3%)

0 (0%)

4.6–5.3

1 (1.7%)

2 (3.5%)

  1. FDG-fluoro deoxy glucose, SUVmax standardized uptake value gm/ml, Nec-necrotic
  2. *Patient with necrotic nodes also had non-necrotic lymph nodes