Skip to main content

Table 6 Immunohistochemical data and clinicopathological parameters for cases underwent interval debulking surgery

From: Subtyping of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma: histopathological and immunohistochemical approach

Group 2

N=39

Ki 67

CD8

ER

Low

High

Low

High

Negative

Positive

Lymphocytes

 <20/HPF

24 (72.7)

3 (50.0)

27 (100.0)

0

16 (66.7)

11 (73.3)

 >20/HPF

9 (27.3)

3 (50.0)

0 (0.0)

12 (100)

8 (33.3)

4 (26.7)

Test of significance

FET

P=0.35

FET

P<0.001*

χ2=0.19

P=0.66

Stroma

 <10%

25 (75.8)

2 (33.3)

21 (77.8)

6 (50)

17 (70.8)

10 (66.7)

 >10%

8 (24.2)

4 (66.7)

6 (22.2)

6 (50)

7 (29.2)

5 (33.3)

Test of significance

FET

P=0.06

χ2=3.01

P=0.08

χ2=0.08

P=0.78

Mitosis

 <30/10HPF

33 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

24 (88.9)

9 (75)

22 (91.7)

11 (73.3)

 >30/10HPF

0 (0.0)

6 (100)

3 (11.1)

3 (25)

2 (8.3)

4 (26.7)

Test of significance

FET

P<0.001*

FET

P=0.34

FET

P=0.18

Architecture

 SET features

15 (45.5)

5 (83.3)

11 (40.7)

9 (75)

10 (41.7)

10 (66.7)

 Papillary features

18 (54.5)

1 (16.7)

16 (59.3)

3 (25)

14 (58.3)

5 (33.3)

Test of significance

χ2=2.92

P=0.09

χ2=3.9

P=0.04*

χ2=2.31

P=0.13

Treatment response

 Regression

7 (21.2)

0 (0.0)

5 (18.5)

2 (16.7)

4 (16.7)

3 (20.0)

 Progression

26 (78.8)

6 (100.0)

22 (81.5)

10 (83.3)

20 (83.3)

12 (80.0)

Test of significance

χ2=1.55

P=0.21

χ2=0.02

P=0.89

FET

P=1.0

Stage

 I & II

7 (21.2)

1 (16.7)

5 (18.5)

3 (25)

4 (16.7)

4 (26.7)

 III & IV

26 (78.8)

5 (83.3)

22 (81.5)

9 (75)

20 (83.3)

11 (73.3)

Test of significance

χ2=0.06

P=0.80

χ2=0.214

P=0.64

FET

P=0.68

Group 2

N=39

PR

Vimentin

E-cadherin

Negative

Positive

Low

High

Negative

Positive

Lymphocytes

 <20/HPF

24 (66.7)

3 (100)

15 (75)

12 (63.2)

24 (68.6)

3 (75)

 >20/HPF

12 (33.3)

0

5 (25)

7 (36.8)

11 (31.4)

1 (25)

Test of significance

FET

P=0.23

χ2=0.64

P=0.42

FET

P=1.0

Stroma

 <10%

25 (69.4)

2 (66.7)

14 (70)

13 (68.4)

23 (65.7)

4 (100)

 >10%

11 (30.6)

1 (33.3)

6 (30)

6 (31.6)

12 (34.3)

0 (0.0)

Test of significance

FET

P=1.0

χ2=0.01

P=0.92

FET

P=0.29

Mitosis

 <30/10HPF

30 (83.3)

3 (100)

19 (95)

14 (73.7)

29 (82.9)

4 (100)

 >30/10HPF

6 (16.7)

0

1 (5)

5 (26.3)

6 (17.1)

0 (0.0

Test of significance

FET

P=1.0

χ2=3.4

P=0.07

FET

P=1.0

Architecture

 SET features

19 (52.8)

1 (33.3)

9 (45)

11 (57.9)

17 (48.6)

3 (75)

 Papillary features

17 (47.2)

2 (66.7)

11 (55)

8 (42.1)

18 (51.4)

1 (25)

Test of significance

FET

P=0.61

χ2=0.65

P=0.42

FET

P=0.61

Treatment response

 Regression

6 (16.7)

1 (33.3)

5 (25)

2 (10.5)

5 (14.3)

2 (50.0)

 Progression

30 (83.3)

2 (66.7)

15 (75)

17 (89.5)

30 (85.7)

2 (50.0)

Test of significance

FET

P=0.45

χ2=1.38

P=0.239

FET

P=0.14

Stage

 I & II

7 (19.4)

1 (33.3)

5 (25)

3 (15.8)

7 (20.0)

1 (25)

 III & IV

29 (80.6)

2 (66.7)

15 (75)

16 (84.2)

28 (80.0)

2 (66.7)

Test of significance

FET

P=0.508

χ2=0.507

P=0.47

FET

P=1.0

  1. FET Fischer’s exact test, MC Monte Carlo