Skip to main content

Podophyllotoxin-polyacrylic acid conjugate micelles: improved anticancer efficacy against multidrug-resistant breast cancer

Abstract

Background

Podophyllotoxin (PPT) is a naturally occurring compound obtained from the roots of Podophyllum species, indicated for a variety of malignant tumors such as breast, lung, and liver tumors. This toxic polyphenol (PPT) exhibited significant activity against P-glycoprotein (P-gp) mediated multidrug-resistant (MDR) cancer cells. However, extremely poor water solubility, a narrow therapeutic window, and high toxicity have greatly restricted the clinical uses of PPT. Therefore, the present research was aimed to synthesize the water-soluble ester prodrug of PPT with polyacrylic acid (PAA), a water-soluble polymer by Steglich esterification reaction, and to screen it for assay, solubility, in vitro hemolysis, in vitro release, and in vitro anticancer activity.

Results

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy results revealed the successful synthesis of podophyllotoxin-polyacrylic acid conjugate (PPC). The assay and saturation solubility of the prodrug is found to be 64.01 ± 4.5% and 1.39 ± 0.05 mg/mL (PPT equivalent) respectively. The PPC showed CMC (critical micelle concentration) of 0.430 mg/mL in distilled water at room temperature. The PPC micelles showed a mean particle size of 215 ± 11 nm with polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.193 ± 0.006. Further, the transmission electron microscope (TEM) results confirmed the self-assembling character of PPC into micelles. The PPC caused significantly less hemolysis (18.6 ± 2.9%) than plain PPT solution. Also, it demonstrated significantly (p < 0.01) higher in vitro cytotoxicity against both sensitive as well as resistance human breast cancer cells (MCF-7 and MDA MB-231) after 48 h of treatment.

Conclusion

The obtained study results clearly revealed the notable in vitro anticancer activity of PPT following its esterification with PAA. However, further in vivo studies are needed to ascertain its efficacy against a variety of cancers.

Background

Cancer or malignancy is a heterogeneous disease characterized by abnormal cell mitosis, and is a serious health concern around the world. Cancer predominance and mortality are expanding year by year and creating a heavier burden globally [1].

Chemotherapy is the most preferred among the available treatment strategies and has been proven to be effective in clinics. But, the multidrug resistance (MDR) is one of the challenges in the efficient treatment of cancers. A toxic polyphenol podophyllotoxin (PPT) was obtained from the roots of plants from the genus Podophyllum [2] and can be used to treat cancers like breast, lung, and liver cancer and it acts by blocking cell division [3, 4]. In earlier research papers, it is reported that PPT is capable to kill effectively the MDR (P-gp mediated) cancer cells and therefore used to treat a variety of MDR tumors efficiently [5,6,7,8]. However, the clinical applications of PPT are significantly restricted due to its enormously poor water solubility, narrow therapeutic window, and high toxicity [9]. Also, chemotherapy of PPT is allied with serious side effects owing to non-specific distribution and lack of selectivity.

Therefore, to beat the conventional chemotherapeutic drug-related issues, various novel nanoformulations such as nanoparticles, nanocapsules, liposomes, polymer-drug conjugates, and polymeric micelles have been proposed. Currently, the polymer-drug conjugate is a chiefly used strategy wherein the polymers are used to modify the chemical structure of the drug without changing the original medicinal use of the drug [10]. In this strategy, sometimes the hydrophobic drug is conjugated with a hydrophilic polymer or vice versa. These polymer-drug conjugates show improved drug entrapment in the nanoparticles, biopharmaceutical properties, selectivity to tumor cells, tumor cell sensitivity, and in vivo stability [11]. Some researchers have developed a prodrug for different drugs like paclitaxel, docetaxel, and used alone or with different delivery carriers [12,13,14]. Moreover, Greenwald and co-workers have observed that PPT can be faster released from polymer-drug conjugate prodrug and has stronger inhibition of cell growth [15].

Polyacrylic acid (PAA) is one of the highly hydrophilic, absorbent, and biodegradable polymers with a number of industrial and biomedical applications. It is used widely in modified-release tablets, oral suspensions, and bioadhesive mean for mucosal and oral contact applications [16]. This copolymer is considered as a pharmaceutically safe. Carboxylic acid groups of PAA facilitate further modifications as well as assist binding of small molecules (drugs) and large molecules (biologics) in mild conditions with no structural deterioration. Moreover, it was also reported that non-antigenic PAA increases the immune response upon exposure with sheep erythrocytes, where they worked as an immunostimulants [17]. Thus, the prime objective of the current research was to synthesize the water-soluble ester prodrug of PPT with hydrophilic PAA and to examine its altered in vitro cell growth inhibition characteristics as a result of its improved solubility.

Methods

Materials and cell culture

Podophyllotoxin (PPT) was purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Polyacrylic acid (PAA), 4-(dimethylamino) pyridine (DMAP), and N, N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), were procured from Sigma Aldrich, Mumbai, India. Dimethylformamide (DMF), HPLC grade acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, and water were procured from Molychem, Mumbai, India. All other analytical reagent grade chemicals were used as such without any further processing.

Cell culture

The cancerous MCF-7 and MDA MB-231(MDR epithelial human triple-negative) breast cancer cells, and non-cancerous human embryonic kidney cell line 293 (HEK-293) were obtained from ATCC, USA. Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum), 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin was used to culture both cancerous and non-cancerous cells at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not applicable.

Synthesis of PPT-PAA conjugates (PPC)

The synthetic scheme of PPC is presented in Fig. 1. The PPT-PAA ester prodrug was synthesized at a 1:1 molar ratio using the Steglich esterification reaction according to previous reports. Briefly, PAA (0.0125 mmol, 25 mg) and DMAP (0.0250 mmol, 3.05 mg) were dissolved in DMF (5 mL) with stirring for 30 min. The DCC (0.0250 mmol, 5 mg) and PPT (0.0250 mmol, 10 mg) were then added under stirring. The reaction mixture was then kept at refrigeration (2 to 4 °C) for 10 min, and then for 24 h at room temperature under mild stirring. The precipitated side product dicyclo-hexyl urea (DHU) obtained was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was subjected to dialysis against double distilled water using a pre-activated dialysis bag of 12,000 molecular weight cutoff (12,000 MWCO) for 24 h. After that, the content present in the dialysis bag was isolated by filtration. The filtrate obtained was evaporated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator at 70 °C. The obtained product (residue) was then subjected to the confirmation using FTIR and NMR [18].

Fig. 1
figure1

Synthetic route of PPC

Characterization of PPC

Spectroscopic characterization

FTIR analysis

The structure of PPC was analyzed by FTIR. The FTIR spectra of PPT and PPC were recorded using an Agilent FTIR spectrophotometer (Agilent, Alpha 100508) over the wavenumber 4000 to 400 cm−1.

NMR analysis

The 1H NMR analysis was also performed to confirm the structure of PPC. The 1H NMR spectra of the PPT and PPC were recorded by dissolving them in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) using FT-NMR Bruker 300 Avance (300 MHz).

PPC assay

Briefly, 3 mg of PPC was dissolved in 3 mL of methanol to get a stock solution concentration of 1000 μg/mL. This solution was then allowed to sonicate for 5-10 min and finally analyzed by a UV-visible spectrophotometer at 290 nm against methanol as a blank solution [18].

Aqueous solubility

The aqueous solubility of PPC was studied by using the rotary shaker method. Briefly, the surplus amount of PPC was added into Eppendorf tube containing 0.5 mL of double distilled (DD) water and kept on a rotary shaker for 24 h. On completion of 24 h of shaking, the filtrate obtained by filtration was subjected for analysis (after suitable dilution with DD water) using a UV-visible spectrophotometer at 290 nm and the PPT content was determined [18].

In vitro hemolysis assay

The hemolysis test was performed in accordance with our previous report. Briefly, the erythrocyte pellet (RBCs) obtained by 10 mL of human blood (defibrinogenated) was diluted (with 0.9% NaCl solution) to obtain a 2% solution of RBCs (stored at refrigeration temperature till further use). The prepared PPT and PPC solutions were then added to the RBCs solution (1 mL), and the volume was adjusted to 5 mL with sodium chloride (NaCl) solution to obtain 10 and 100 μg/mL PPT and PPC solutions. The above solutions were then stored for 1 h at 37 °C. After incubation, the solutions were centrifuged (at 1000 rpm for 10 min), clear and transparent supernatant was collected and subjected for hemoglobin analysis using a UV-visible spectrophotometer at 420 nm. The positive and negative controls used were de-ionized water and NaCl solution (0.9%), respectively. The % hemolysis was calculated using the following formula [18, 19].

$$ \% Hemolysis=\frac{\mathrm{Test}\ \mathrm{sample}\ \mathrm{absorbance}-\mathrm{Negative}\ \mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{absorbance}}{\mathrm{Positive}\ \mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{absorbance}-\mathrm{Negative}\ \mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{absorbance}}\times 100 $$

In vitro cytotoxicity

The effect of PPT and PPC on the viability of cancerous cells (MCF-7 and MDAMB-231) and non-cancerous cell (HEK-293) was determined by using 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) dye reduction assay [18]. Briefly, 50,000 cells were transferred to each well of 96-well plates and allowed to adhere and grow. After overnight incubation in a 5% CO2 and 37 °C atmosphere, the supernatant DMEM was replaced with 100 μL of serially diluted test solutions (PPT and PPC). The 96-well plates were then incubated for 48 h in a similar environment. Post incubation, the supernatant drug solutions were replaced with the same volume of MTT stock solution prepared in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) 0.6 mg/mL. After 4 h incubation, the MTT solution was replaced with the same volume of DMSO that dissolves the formazan crystals formed in viable cells. The absorbance of the resultant DMSO solutions was measured at 590 nm using an ELISA plate reader. The absorbance of the test samples was compared to the absorbance of untreated cells to obtain the dose-response curves, and IC50 values were calculated from the same curves [18].

Critical micelle concentration (CMC)

The self-assembling of prepared PPC into micelles was determined by the iodine UV-visible spectrophotometric method. The double-distilled water was used to prepare PPC solutions of different concentrations. The prepared test solutions were mixed with a fixed volume (25 μL) of potassium iodide/iodine solution and incubated overnight (12 h) in dark at room temperature. Post incubation, the absorbance of test samples and blank sample (containing no PPC) were measured, against double distilled water as a blank, at 366 nm [20].

Preparation of micelles

PPC micelles were prepared using a thin-film hydration technique. Briefly, 2.0 mg of PPC was dissolved in 2 mL of methanol in a beaker. The PPC film was obtained by evaporating methanol at room temperature. The PPC film was redispersed using a fixed volume of double-distilled (10 mL) and using a bath sonication technique. Post redispersion, the micellar solution was centrifuged (5000 rpm) to obtain a clear solution free from visible dispersed particles [18].

Characterization of micelles

Mean particle size

The mean particle size and zeta potential of PPC micelles were investigated using Malvern ZS Zetasizer (Malvern Instruments Ltd.) at room temperature (25 °C) and measurements were carried out in triplicate.

Morphology by TEM

In brief, the test sample (2 drops of micellar solution) was transferred on to a copper grid (nitrocellulose covered) and air-dried for 12 h at room temperature. Then, the dried test sample was stained using a 2% w/v solution of phosphotungustic acid (negative staining). The sample was then air-dried at room temperature and observed under TEM (TEM, FEI Tecnai T-20ST).

In vitro release study

The dialysis tube technique was used to determine the in vitro release profile of PPT from the prepared PPC micelles [20]. The results were compared with the release profile of PPT from its dispersion prepared in PBS. Into dialysis tubes (MWCO = 12000 Da), the PPT-loaded PPC micelles and PPT dispersions equivalent to 2 mg of PPT were transferred. The tubes were then placed into beakers containing PBS (80 mL) of pH 7.4 as release medium. The release medium was maintained at 37 ± 2 °C and stirred (150 rpm) during the study. One milliliter of release medium was removed at a predetermined time (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 h) for analysis. At the same time, a 1 mL fresh release medium was transferred back to the beakers. The test samples withdrawn were analyzed, following centrifugation and suitable dilutions with release medium, at 290 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The release profile of PPT from each formulation was carried out in triplicate. Cumulative % PPT release was calculated and plotted against time [12].

Statistical analysis

Data are mentioned as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by using the GraphPad Prism software version 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The results obtained were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Synthesis and conformation of PPC

The Steglich esterification reaction was used for the synthesis of PPC. The structure of the PPT prodrug is initially confirmed by FTIR. The FTIR spectra of PPT and PPC are shown in Fig. 2. In the FTIR spectrum of PPT (Fig. 2a), the peak at 2923 cm−1 is the characteristic peak of the benzene ring in PPT. In the FTIR spectrum of PPC (Fig. 2b), the peak at 1116 cm−1 is attributed to the C-O stretching vibrations of PAA while the peak at 1735 cm−1 indicates ester group formation with PPT. The obtained result demonstrated that PPC was synthesized successfully.

Fig. 2
figure2

FTIR spectrum of (a) PPT and (b) PPC

The structure of PPC is also confirmed with 1H NMR (Fig. 3). The peaks at 5.8-7.0 ppm are assigned to the phenyl groups of PPT (Fig. 3a). In the 1H NMR spectrum of PPC (Fig. 3b), the peaks at 5.5-7.7 ppm are characteristic peaks of the phenyl groups of PPT. Besides, we observed the chemical shift value of 3.2 ppm corresponding to the formation of an ester bond between PPT and PAA. This result also confirmed the successful synthesis of PPC. Further, these results are in accordance with the earlier report [21].

Fig. 3
figure3

NMR spectrum of (a) PPT and (b) PPC

Characterization of PPC

The assay of PPC was found to be 64.01 ± 4.5%. The solubility of PPC in water is found to be 1.39 ± 0.05 mg/mL (PPT equivalent) [12].

In vitro hemolysis assay

The positive control (de-ionized water) showed complete (100%) hemolysis while very slight or no hemolysis (0%) was observed with the negative control (0.9% NaCl). The plain PPT displayed less hemolysis (12.8 ± 1.7%) at 10 μg/mL concentrations and more hemolysis (51.7 ± 6.4%) at 100 μg/mL. In contrast, PPC exhibited significantly (p < 0.01) less hemolysis (6.2 ± 1.2% and 18.6 ± 2.9%) than plain PPT at the same concentration.

In vitro cytotoxicity

The antitumor activity of plain PPT and PPC was examined using MTT assay against cancerous cells (MCF-7 and MDAMB-231cell), and non-cancerous cell (HEK-293). The cytotoxicity of both PPT and PPC is expressed in terms of IC50 value. The IC50 value is the concentration of drug necessary to kill 50% of incubated cells in a designated time. The IC50 values of both PPT and PPC are depicted in Table 1. We observed substantially increased cytotoxicity (p < 0.01) with PPC (low IC50 values), against both cell lines, in comparison to plain PPT after 48 h study. On the other hand, both PPT and PPC showed significantly low cytotoxicity (p < 0.01) against non-cancerous (HEK-293) cells after 48 h of incubation when compared to cancerous cells.

Table 1 Comparison of IC50 values (μg/mL) of tested substances against breast cancer and non-cancerous cell lines

CMC of PPC micelles

The CMC of PPC micelles was found to be 0.430 mg/mL.

Preparation and characterization of PPC micelles

The mean particle size of PPC micelles measured by Malvern zeta sizer is found to be 215 ± 11 nm with PDI of 0.193 ± 0.006 (Fig. 4a). The zeta potential of PPC micelles was found to be −37.3 mV. Furthermore, the structure of PPC micelles was confirmed by TEM analysis. The TEM image of self-assembled PPC micelles (Fig. 4b) showed that the micelles are well dispersed and spherical in shape.

Fig. 4
figure4

The mean particle size (a) PPC micelles and (b) TEM image showing self-assembling nature of PPC

In vitro release study

The release profile of PPT from plain PPT solution and PPC micelles is depicted in Fig. 5. Above 90% of PPT is released from the PPT dispersion in just 4 h. On the other hand, PPT release from PPC micelles is found significantly (p < 0.01) sustained (35 ± 3.2% after 48 h of the study) in comparison to PPT dispersion.

Fig. 5
figure5

Cumulative % of PPT released from the plain PPT solution and PPC micelles

Discussion

In the current research, the PPC is synthesized via the ester bond formed between the reactive C-4 hydroxyl group of PPT and the carboxyl groups of the hydrophilic polymer, PAA [13, 14]. The solubility of PPT is found to be about 200-fold higher than the reported standard PPT solubility (0.001 mg/mL) following conjugation. Thus, the aqueous solubility of PPT following conjugation with PAA is found to increase substantially. The increased solubility of PPT is due to its conjugation with hydrophilic PAA.

The chief prerequisite of any type of nanomedicine is its good compatibility with blood. Plain PPT demonstrated significantly more hemolysis (3.0-fold increased hemolysis) than PPC. The hemolysis test results clearly revealed low or moderate hemolysis by the PPC showing good biocompatibility. Thus, the obtained results suggest that PPC micelles are safe and biocompatible for intravenous injection.

We found 2.0-fold and 3.0-fold higher cytotoxicity of PPC than plain PPT against MCF-7 and MDA MB-231 cells respectively. The significantly enhanced cytotoxic activity of PPC against cancerous cells might be due to endocytosis and increased intracellular accumulation of PPT by nanoparticle uptake. Moreover, the nanometer particle size of PPC micelles and sustained release of PPT from PPC micelles also responsible for the higher cytotoxic activity of PPC. Further, the above results are in accordance with the earlier report [22].

To test the toxicity of PPT and PPC toward healthy cells, in the present study, we also performed the in vitro cytotoxicity study against HEK-293 cells. The obtained results revealed the less cytotoxicity (significantly higher IC50 values) of PPT and PPC toward non-cancerous HEK-293 cells as compared to cancerous cells.

The CMC value is a chief parameter used to evaluate the micelle forming ability of block copolymer. It can also reflect the stability of the micelles upon in vivo dilutions. The PPC micelles showed significantly less CMC. These relatively lower CMC of PPC micelles revealed that they would remain stable in solutions even after in vivo dilution [23,24,25].

The higher mean particle size of PPC micelles could be due to the presence of more PPT-PAA conjugates, which can enlarge the micelles inner hydrophobic core. The PDI value near to zero of PPC micelles suggested the uniform size and homogeneity of the micelles.

The higher release rate of PPT from PPT dispersion could be attributed to its free diffusion through the dialysis membrane into a release medium. PPC micelles demonstrated the sustained release of PPT that could prolong the circulation time and minimize the exposure of PPT to healthy tissues. Furthermore, this behavior could also increase the accumulation of PPT in tumors via the EPR effect and increase the therapeutic efficacy.

Conclusion

In the current investigation, the water-soluble prodrug of PPT was synthesized by conjugating it with the hydrophilic PAA polymer. The prodrug demonstrated improved water solubility and substantial in vitro cell growth inhibition characteristics. Besides, it demonstrated lower hemolytic behavior which stipulates its appropriateness for intravenous applications. The marvelous in vitro cytotoxic behavior of prodrug against MDR breast cancer cells indicates its application in the treatment of MDR tumors. The prodrug is found to be self-assembled into micelles with low CMC value indicating its high stability upon systemic dilution. In addition, prodrug micelles exhibited sustained drug release which could cause increased circulation half-life and reduced systemic toxicity. Thus, the current approach could be promising for the efficient treatment of MDR cancers. However, further in vivo studies are needed to validate these obtained in vitro results.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials are available upon request.

Abbreviations

BCS:

Biopharmaceutical classification system

CMC:

Critical micelle concentration

DCC:

N, N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide

DHU:

Dicyclo-hexyl urea

DMAP:

Dimethylamino pyridine

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium

DMF:

Dimethyl formamide

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulphoxide

EPR:

Enhanced permeation and retention effect

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared

MDR:

Multidrug resistance

MTT:

3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

MWCO:

Molecular weight cutoff

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

NaCl:

Sodium chloride

PAA:

Polyacrylic acid

PBS:

Phosphate buffer solution

PDI:

Polydispersity index

P-gp:

P-glycoprotein

PPC:

Podophyllotoxin-polyacrylic acid conjugate

PPT:

Podophyllotoxin

TEM:

Transmission electron microscope

References

  1. 1.

    Liang L, Lin SW, Dai W, Lu JK, Yang TY, Xiang Y, et al. Novel cathepsin B-sensitive paclitaxel conjugate: higher water solubility, better efficacy and lower toxicity. J Control Release. 2012;160:618–29.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Xue YH, Zhang R, Sun XY, Wang SL. The construction and characterization of layered double hydroxides as delivery vehicles for podophyllotoxins. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:1197–202.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fouad Y, Aanei C. Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7(5):1016–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yu X, Che Z, Xu H. Recent advances in the chemistry and biology of podophyllotoxins. Chemistry. 2017;23(19):4467–526.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Roy AM, Ernsting J, Undzys E, Li SD. A highly tumor-targeted nanoparticle of podophyllotoxin penetrated tumor core and regressed multidrug resistant tumors. Biomaterials. 2015;52:335–46.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huicong Z, Shixian L, Dawei Z, Mingxiao D, Xuefei Z, Zhaohui T, Xuesi C. A polypeptide based podophyllotoxin conjugate for the treatment of multi drug resistant breast cancer with enhanced efficiency and minimal toxicity. Acta Biomater. 2018;73:388–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Subrahmanyam D, Renuka B, Rao CV, Sagar PS, Deevi DS, Babu JM, et al. Novel D-ring analogues of podophyllotoxin as potent anti-cancer agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1998;8(11):1391–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Giri A, Lakshmi NM. Production of podophyllotoxin from Podophyllum hexandrum: a potential natural product for clinically useful anticancer drugs. Cytotechnology. 2000;34:17–26.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu YQ, Yang L, Tian X. Podophyllotoxin: Current perspective. Curr Bioact Compd. 2007;3:37–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Koziara JM, Whisman TR, Tseng MT, Mumper RJ. In-vivo efficacy of novel paclitaxel nanoparticles in paclitaxel-resistant human colorectal tumors. J Control Release. 2006;112(3):312–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Manjappa AS, Kumbhar PS, Khopade PS, Patil AB, Disouza JI. Mixed micelles as nano polymer therapeutics of docetaxel: increased in vitro cytotoxicity and decreased in vivo toxicity. Curr Drug Deliv. 2018;15(4):564–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Goel PN, Gude RP. Unraveling the antimetastatic potential of pentoxifylline, a methylxanthine derivative in human MDA-MB- 231 breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;358(1-2):141–51.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chen C, Yu Y, Wang X, Shi P, Wang Y, Wang P. Manipulation of pH-sensitive interactions between podophyllotoxin-chitosan for enhanced controlled drug release. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;95:451–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang Y, Huang L, Shen Y, Tang L, Sun R, Shi D, et al. Electrostatic interactions between polyglutamic acid and polylysine yields stable polyion complex micelles for deoxypodophyllotoxin delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:7963–77.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Greenwald RB, Conover CD, Pendri A, Choe YH, Martinez A, Wu D, et al. Drug delivery of anticancer agents: water soluble 4-poly (ethylene glycol) derivatives of the lignan, podophyllotoxin. J Control Release. 1999;61(3):281–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang W, Lin W, Pei Q, Hu X, Xie Z, Jing X. Redox-hypersensitive organic nanoparticles for selective treatment of cancer cells. Chem. Mater. 2016;28(12):4440–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Murat T, Rabia CK, Sevil DI, Melahat B, Zeynep A, Serhat E, et al. Conjugation, characterization and toxicity of lipophosphoglycan-polyacrylic acid conjugate for vaccination against leishmaniasis. J Biomed Sci. 2013;20(1):20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Manjappa AS, Kumbhar PS, Kasabe R, Diwate S, Disouza JI. Ameliorated in vitro anticancer efficacy of methotrexate D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate ester against breast cancer cells. Future J Pharmaceutical Sci. 2019;5(10):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kumbhar PS, Birange S, Atvale M, Manjappa AS, Disouza JI. D-gluconic acid based methotrexate prodrug loaded mixed micelles composed of MDR reversing copolymer: in vitro and in vivo results. Colloid Polym Sci. 2018;296(12):1971–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kumbhar PS, Patil NJ, Sambamoorthy U, Disouza JI, Manjappa AS. Simvastatin loaded nano mixed micelles: an approach to treat hormone dependent carcinomas. Int J Pharmaceutical Sci Res. 2019;10(2):546–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Utsugi T, Shibata J, Sugimoto Y, Aoyagi K, Wierzba K, Kobunai T, et al. Antitumor activity of a novel podophyllotoxin derivative (top-53) against lung cancer and lung metastatic cancer. Cancer Res. 1996;56(12):2809–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bromberg L. Polyether-modified poly (acrylic acid): synthesis and applications. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1998;37(11):4267–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Levy RK, Hall IH, Leex K. Antitumor agents LXII: synthesis and biological evaluation of podophyllotoxin esters and related derivatives. Am Pharmaceutical Assoc. 1983;72:1158–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li Y, Chen M, Yao B, Lu X, Zhang X, He P, et al. Transferrin receptor-targeted redox/pH-sensitive podophyllotoxin prodrug micelles for multidrug-resistant breast cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(38):5814–24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Manjappa AS, Kumbhar PS, Patil AB, Disouza JI. Polymeric mixed micelles: improving the anticancer efficacy of single-copolymer micelles. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2019;36(1):1–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are greatly thankful to our Head of Institute and Institute Management for supporting this research project.

Funding

No funding was received for this project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PK, AS, and OP: Performed all above research activities. PK and AM: Designed, monitored, and coordinated the research activities. JD: Participated in statistical analysis and data interpretation. PK and AM: Involved in the preparation and drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John I. Disouza.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumbhar, P.S., Sakate, A.M., Patil, O.B. et al. Podophyllotoxin-polyacrylic acid conjugate micelles: improved anticancer efficacy against multidrug-resistant breast cancer. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 32, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-020-00053-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Podophyllotoxin prodrug
  • PAA
  • Hemolysis
  • In vitro release
  • Cytotoxicity