Skip to main content

Chloroform extract and acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid from Boswellia dalzielii stem bark induce apoptosis and cell cycle blockage in AW8507 cells

Abstract

Background

Globally, head and neck cancer is the sixth most common cancer. Despite the advancement in treatment, drug resistance remains a major cause for setback. In an earlier work, the authors reported that Boswellia dalzielii (Hutch) stem bark exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxicity in head and neck cancer cells, AW8507. Therefore, the cell death induction effect of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark chloroform extract in head and neck cancer cell line, AW8507, and its derived constituent on cell cycle and apoptosis proteins was further investigated.

Methods

The cell death induction activity of the Boswellia dalzielii stem bark chloroform fraction (CLBD) in AW8507 was determined using Annexin V-FITC/PI staining in flow cytometry. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was employed for compounds analysis of the CLBD, and reverse virtual screening was used to identify the mechanism of action of the compound, acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid, that was elucidated in the Boswellia dalzielii chloroform fraction.

Results

The data obtained showed that Boswellia dalzielii stem bark Chloroform extract increased the percentage of cells presenting for early apoptosis from 4.14 to 10.10% in AW8507 cells. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of the chloroform fraction identified acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid. Reverse virtual screening on selected proteins showed that acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid is a multi-protein target compound. It binds preferably to phosphorylated-cyclin dependent kinase 1 (p-CDK1) (binding score =  − 9.2 kcal/mol), blocking the activation of cyclin B-CDK1 needed for cell cycle progression at G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid also binds more tightly with αβ tubulin (binding score = 8.9 kcal/mol) than with the standard drug, docetaxel (binding score = 8.3 kcal/mol).

Conclusions

The results obtained confirmed the culpability of Boswellia dalzielii-derived acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid in the obstruction of the cell cycle progression in head and neck cancer cell line, AW8507; and the induction of apoptosis earlier reported for Boswellia dalzielii (Hutch) stem bark. Additional in vitro and/or in vivo studies would be required to validate in silico observations.

Background

Despite the growing understanding of tumor biology and advancement in the treatment of head and neck cancer, morbidity and mortality rates have not abated due mainly to drug resistance among several factors. There are over 600,000 incidences and 350,000 deaths associated with head and neck cancer globally [1]. The public health burden of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is profound and the incidence is expected to rise by 30% by the year 2030 [2]. Studies have established that cancer can be considered as a disease of the cell cycle due to ineffective cell cycle checkpoint control [3]. Cell cycle arrest of cancer cells is therefore regarded as one of the target mechanisms in cancer treatment [3]. Likewise, apoptosis, a significant terminal pathway for cells of multicellular organisms, that causes a diversity of biological events such as proliferation/homeostasis, differentiation, development and elimination of harmful cells as a protective strategy to remove diseased cells [4], represents one of the prominent mechanisms of chemotherapy [5]. Many natural compounds (curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, and quercetin) from plants have been found to inhibit one or more pathways that contribute to proliferation [6]. Boswellia dalzielii is the West African species of the frankincense genus and its phytochemical screening revealed the presence of saponins, tannins, flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, steroids, and terpenes [7]. The chemical components of B. dalzielii gum resin have been reported to contain beta-sistosterol, resveratrol, garlic acid, incensole, and protocatechuic acid [8]. The cytotoxic activity of Boswellia dalzielii gum resin and leaves were previously investigated on brine shrimp and ovarian cancer cells, respectively [9, 10]. In an earlier work, the authors reported that Boswellia dalzielii stem bark exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxic activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (AW8507 cell line) and blocked the cell cycle progression at G2/M [11]. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cell death induction activity of the chloroform extract in AW8507 cells, determine the active constituent and its activity against selected enzymes in silico.

Methods

Boswellia dalzielii stem bark

Boswellia dalzielii stem bark was gathered at Dutsen Hanwa area of Zaria (latitude 11° 06′ 40.61″ N, longitude 7° 43′ 21.72″ E), Kaduna state, Northern Nigeria, in the month of October, 2017, and was authenticated at Biological Sciences Department, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, and a voucher specimen was deposited with voucher number 900121.

Extraction, fractionation, and phytochemical identification

The chloroform fraction of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark was prepared as earlier described [11]. Further, the chloroform fraction was subjected to silica gel (70–230 mesh) column chromatography. Briefly, silica gel was mixed with n-hexane to form a homogenous suspension/slurry and stirred using a glass-stirring rod to remove bubbles. The silica gel slurry was then poured into a glass column. The sample to load on the column was prepared by dissolving 3.7 g of the chloroform fraction in 50 ml of hexane. A preparative thin layer chromatography (TLC) had been carried out in which the chloroform fraction were separated in a mobile phase of chloroform/methanol (99:1). To the solution, 10 g of silica was added and mixed by stirring with a glass rod. The mixture was allowed to dry at room temperature. The dried silica/Boswellia dalzielii fraction mixture was layered on the column layer bed. The column was first eluted with n-hexane as the mobile phase with the polarity increasing by 5% increments of chloroform. After getting to 100% chloroform, the polarity was further increased by 5% increments of methanol (Fig. 1). Six sub-fractions were collected in glass beakers. The collected fractions were concentrated to dryness at room temperature.

Fig. 1
figure1

Extraction and fractionation of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark

Cell culture

The head and neck cancer cell line (AW8507) was generously obtained from the Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi-Mumbai, 410,210, India, and were cultured in Dulbecco’s minimum essential medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 50 μg/mL antibiotics. The cells were incubated at 37 °C in CO2 incubator in an atmosphere of humidified 5% CO2 and 95% air. The cells were maintained by sub-culturing in 25-cm3 tissue culture flasks. Cells growing in the exponential phase were used for cell death determination assay.

Determination of cell death by Annexin V-propidium iodide (AnnV-PI)

Mode of cell death induced by the chloroform fraction of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark (CLBD) was evaluated by using Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences). Briefly, the cells of AW8507 (3 mL, 1 × 105 cells/mL) were seeded into each well of 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h (cell attachment and recovery). After incubation (24 h), the untreated and treated (20 µg/mL) cells were harvested and washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution. Subsequently, the cells were mixed with 190 µL of pre-diluted binding buffer (1 ×) containing Annexin Fluorescein 5-isothiocynate (Annexin V-FITC) (5 µL) and of propidium iodide (PI) (1 µL) (100 μg/mL) and further incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in the dark. Subsequently, 400 µL of binding buffer (1 ×) was added into each tube. The percentage of cell undergoing apoptosis and necrosis was quantified using a flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Accuri, San Diego, CA, USA) equipped with Cell Quest software within 1 h.

HPLC–MS analysis of chloroform extract sub-fractions

The sub-fractions obtained from the chloroform extract were subjected to further analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. For the analysis, 0.5–1.0 mg/ml of CLBD sub-fractions was dissolved in methanol. After that, it was filtered through 0.45 µm membrane filter prior to the injection into HPLC–MS system. HPLC–MS system was Agilent 1260 infinity HPLC (UV Detector wavelength, 225 ± 50 nm bandwidth), auto-sampler (injection volume 1 µl), and thermostated column (Phenomenex Kinetex XB-C18, 50 × 4.6 mm, 2.6 µm) (40C). The mobile phase A was 99.9% water with 0.1% acetic acid, while mobile phase B was 99.9% acetonitrile with 0.1% acetic acid. The flow rate was 2 mL/min. Agilent 6130 single quadrupole mass spectrometer (scanning in ES + / − and APCI over 70–1100 m/z) and Agilent 1290 Infinity II Evaporative Light Scattering Detector (ELSD) was used for measuring mass spectra. Agilent Mass Hunter software was used for data acquisition and processing. Compounds in the chloroform extract sample were tentatively identified by comparison of their monoisotopic/exact masses, mass fingerprints, and reference literatures.

Reverse virtual screening of Acety-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid on selected proteins of the cell cycle

A reverse virtual screening (rVS) was performed to specifically determine the binding affinities of Acety-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid (AKBA) in the selected proteins [12]. Briefly, a total of 24 proteins (Forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1), Aurora kinase, checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1), serine/threonine polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), Cell Division Cycle 25 homolog C (CDC25C), Cyclin B1, p-CDK1, DNA topoisomerase 2 alpha (TOP2A), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (Akt), proto-oncogene Neu (HER2), mesenchymal epithelia transition factor (c-MET), tumor protein p53 (TP53), mouse double minute 2 homolog protein (MDM2), Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), vascular endothelia growth factor receptor (VEGFR), caspase 7, caspase 3, proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and αβ tubulin) were selected to form a biomolecular library. The individual crystal structures of the proteins were retrieved from the protein data bank (PDB). The PDB entry values are 3G738, 4BYJ9, 2C3K10, 2RKU11, 3OP312, 6GU413, 6GU413, 5GWK14, 5JHB15, 3D0E16, 3PP017, 4KNB18, 5O1C19, 5LN220, 3KRR21, 6NUQ22, 5MTX23, 4AGD24, 1I5125, 1RHQ26, 3EL727, 3C4C28, 5XDL29, and 1TUB30. The protein structures were individually prepared on the graphical user interface (GUI) of University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) chimera. The proteins were further prepared on the ADT interface where non-polar hydrogens and standard charges were added. Using coordinates from the co-crystallized ligands, target binding sites of the proteins were defined using a gridbox with size and center values that varied across the proteins. Each protein was then saved in.pdbqt formats to form the protein library against which the test compound was virtually screened. The 2-dimensional (2D) structure of the test compound, acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid, was prepared using the MarvinSketch graphical user interphase, after which it was structurally and geometrically optimized with a universal force field (UFF) using the Avogadro module [13]. Afterward, acetyl-11-keto-boswellic acid was prepared on AutoDock tools, torsions adjusted and rotatable/non-rotatable bonds were set. This was also saved in.pdbqt format. Reverse virtual screening was then performed using the AutoDock Vina software. Binding scores of acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid to each protein were then obtained. On the other hand, Docetaxel (TXL) was used as the standard molecule for comparatively measuring the binding activity of acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid (AKBA). To this effect, docetaxel was retrieved from the PubChem drug repository after which it was optimized similarly to AKBA (Fig. 2). Docetaxel (TXL) was docked singly to αβ Tubulin using AutoDock tools since docetaxel reportedly targets and bind the β domain of αβ Tubulin.

Fig. 2
figure2

2D and optimized structures of the test compound acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid (AKBA) (A) and the standard compound, docetaxel (TXL) (B)

Results

Boswellia dalzielii stem bark induced apoptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

As shown in Fig. 3, there was an increase in the percentage of cells presenting for early apoptosis (Q4), from 4.14 to 10.10%, and a significant reduction in the percentage of viable cells from 94.20% in the untreated control cells to 86.42% observed in the CLBD treated cells (Q1). Similarly, percentage of cells presenting for the second and third quadrant (Q2 and Q3) the untreated control AW8507 cells to the CLBD treated cells, increased from 0.09% and 1.61% to 0.31% and 3.17% respectively.

Fig. 3
figure3

Cell death induction activity of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark chloroform extract in AW8507 cell. Viable cells (Q1), early apoptotic (Q4), late apoptotic (Q3), and dead (Q2) cells. A-DUAL, 004 (untreated AW8507 cells (control)); B-DUAL. 008 (chloroform extract treated AW8507 cells)

HPLC–MS analysis of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark chloroform fraction revealed the presence of acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid (AKBA)

The HPLC–MS analysis of chloroform extract exhibited several compounds within the total ion chromatogram (TIC) (m/z 50–1000). The mass obtained from the ion chromatogram (± 2 ppm) of molecular ion (m/z 512.3) as shown in Fig. 4 represent the putative compound acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid. Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid has a molecular mass of 512.7 g/mol and empirical formula, C32H48O5.

Fig. 4
figure4

Total ion current (TIC) and extracted ion chromatograms of acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid (AKBA)

Reverse virtual screening of AKBA on selected proteins revealed it is a multi-protein target compound

Results of the reverse virtual screening presented in Table 1 showed that AKBA exhibited the most favorable affinity to p-CDK1 (binding score =  − 9.2 kcal/mol). As shown in Fig. 5, strong hydrogen bond were observed between AKBA and Glu12, Val18, and Asp86 at the crucial p-cdk1 binding site while the aromatic ring of Phe80 would allow for the formation of a stable π-π interaction with the proximal dimethyl-hexane ring. Alkyl groups of Lys33, Val18, Ala145, Leu135, Ile10, Ala31, and Val64 could as well form stable alkyl interactions and π-alkyl interactions with the aromatic rings in AKBA. The results in Table 1 also showed that AKBA is a multi-target compound as it binds to EGFR, B-Raf, Src kinase, MAPK, PI3K, and CHK1 (binding score =  − 8.6, − 8.8, − 8.7, − 8.9, − 8.3, and 8.5 kcal/mol respectively). Furthermore, Table 2 showed the distinct activities between AKBA and the standard drug, TXL, evaluated against αβ Tubulin; TXL had a lower binding affinity (binding score =  − 8.3 kcal/mol) as compared with AKBA (binding score =  − 8.9 kcal/mol).

Table 1 Reverse virtual screening analyses of AKBA against selected proteins
Fig. 5
figure5

Interaction mechanisms of AKBA at the active domain of p-CDK1. A Binding orientation of AKBA at the target site. B Crucial residues that complementarily interact with AKBA at the p-CDK1 binding domain

Table 2 Reverse virtual screening of Acetyl-keto-11-beta-boswellic acid (AKBA) and docetaxel (TXL) against αβ Tubulin

In the structural depictions, AKBA (black) and TXL (red) occupy the defined active site of the target protein which is employed in its crystallographic state as retrieved from the protein data bank.

Discussion

Over the years, many natural compounds extracted from different plants and presenting significant pharmacological effects have been used for the treatment of various chronic diseases. Currently, more than 10,000 phytochemicals made up of tannins, flavones, triterpenoids, steroids, saponins, and alkaloids have been identified, and many more are yet to be discovered [14]. As shown in Fig. 3, chloroform extract obtained from Boswellia dalzielii stem bark ethanol extract (CLBD) induced apoptosis in AW8507 cells. Apoptosis is understood to play a key role in the survival and proliferation of the neoplastic cells, failure to activate apoptosis represents as one of the major obstacles to the success of a particular cancer treatment [15]. Some of the compounds identified in CLBD (acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid, incensole, n-hexadecanoic acid, and decanoic acid) have been previously reported in various extracts of Boswellia dalzielii [11]. Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid identified in the chloroform extract of the Boswellia dalzielii stem bark (CLBD) via the HPLC–MS technique is one of a series of pentacyclic molecules called the boswellic acids which derived from the Boswellia genus [16]. Reports suggest that acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic (AKBA) regulates a variety of molecular targets such as 5-lipoxygenase, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), cathelicidine peptide (LL-37), hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), and other molecules that contribute to inflammation and tumor progression [17, 18].

The reverse virtual screening (rVS) of AKBA on some randomly selected cell cycle and/or apoptosis regulator protein targets revealed it is a multi-target compound, having the most favorable affinity for p-CDK1 within the constructed biomolecular library. Cyclin/CDKs complexes are the major controllers the cell cycle progression via phosphorylation of the target genes [19]. The data obtained in this study showed that AKBA, identified in the chloroform fraction of Boswellia dalzielii could have blocked the G2/M phase progression in AW8507 cells earlier reported [11], by downregulating the expression of CDK1 as it demonstrated a favorable affinity of − 9.2 kcal/mol with p-CDK1 in silico, whereas AKBA affinity for the Cyclin B1-CDK1 binding interface was comparatively low (-6.7 kcal/mol) which further indicated that AKBA directly inhibits CDK1 preferentially. According to the docking scores obtained, AKBA also demonstrated a good binding affinity with CHK1 protein (binding score =  − 8.5 kcal/mol), but unfavorable affinity with the active site of CDC25C with a positive energy of 230.9 kcal/mol. As shown in Fig. 6, the binding of AKBA preferably to p-CDK1 and at the same time to CHK1, collectively leads to the suppression of CDK1-cyclin B1 complex which has been found to be highly expressed in the more aggressive cancer phenotype [20], thus blocking the cell cycle progression.

Fig. 6
figure6

Blockage of cell cycle progression by chloroform extract and acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid obtained from Boswellia dalzielii stem bark at G2/M Phase. CLBD (chloroform extract of the Boswellia dalzielii stem bark)

Furthermore, the affinity of AKBA with EGFR and PI3K observed in silico (Table 1) further potentiates the efficacy of AKBA to block proliferation in head and neck cancer through multiple target proteins; however, more studies in vivo and/or in vitro would be required to confirm these results. In addition, the tendency of AKBA to bind β-Tubulin with a stronger binding affinity (− 8.9 kcal/mol) when compared to docetaxel (− 8.3 kcal/mol) (Table 2), further signified the possibility of compound AKBA being responsible for the apoptosis-induction potential of chloroform extract obtained from Boswellia dalzielii stem bark (CLBD) in AW8507 cells of the head and neck cancer because inhibition of β-Tubulin and CDK1 have been implicated in the obstruction of the anti-apoptotic proteins B-cell lymphoma extra-large (Bcl-XL) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) [21, 22].

Conclusions

Taking the obtained findings together, chloroform extract obtained from Boswellia dalzielii stem bark is an inducer of apoptosis in AW8507 cells, head, and neck cancer cell line. The reverse virtual docking of the compound acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid on selected proteins confirmed it possessed affinity for multiple protein targets in the pathways associated with the cell cycle, with highest affinity for phosphorylated-cyclin dependent kinase 1 (p-CDK1). Compound acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid also demonstrated higher affinity for αβ tubulin than the anti-head and neck cancer standard drug, docetaxel. Thus, acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid was responsible for the anticancer activity of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark extract earlier reported in vitro. Further in vitro and/or in vivo studies would be required to validate in silico observations, especially in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Availability of data and materials

All materials and all data generated during this study are included in this research article.

Abbreviations

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

αβ Tubulin:

Alpha-beta tubulin

PI3K:

Phosphoinositide-3-kinase

CHK1:

Checkpoint kinase 1

CLBD:

Chloroform extract of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark ethanol extract

TXL:

Docetaxel

AKBA:

Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid

CDC25C:

Cell Division Cycle 25 homolog C

CDK1:

Cyclin dependent kinase 1

HNSCC:

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

FOXM1:

Forkhead box protein M1

PLK1:

Serine/threonine polo-like kinase 1

Cyclin B1, TOP2A:

DNA topoisomerase 2 alpha

Akt:

Protein kinase B

HER2:

Proto-oncogene Neu

c-MET:

Mesenchymal epithelia transition factor

TP53:

Tumor protein p53, MDM2mouse double minute 2 homolog protein

JAK:

Janus tyrosine kinase

STAT3:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

MAPK:

Mitogen activated protein kinase

VEGFR:

Vascular endothelia growth factor receptor

References

  1. 1.

    Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:359–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Pineros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1941–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Diaz-Moralli S, Tarrado-Castellarnau M, Miranda A, Cascante M. Targeting cell cycle regulation in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;138:255–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35:495516.

  5. 5.

    Fulda S, Debatin KM. Extrinsic vs intrinsic apoptosis pathways in anticancer chemotherapy. Oncogene. 2006;25(34):4798–811.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    McCubrey JA, Lertpiriyapong K, Steelman LS, Abrams SL, Yang LV, Murata RM, et al. Effects of resveratrol, curcumin, berberine and other nutraceuticals on aging, cancer development, cancer stem cells and microRNAs. Aging. 2017;9(6):1477–536.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Adelakun EA, Finbar EAV, Agina SE, Makinde AA. Antimicrobial activity of Boswellia dalzielii stem bark. Fitoterapia. 2001;72(7):822–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alemika ET, Onawunmi OG, Olugbade AT. Isolation and characterization of incensole from Boswellia dalzielii stem bark. JPB. 2004;1(1):7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Alemika TE, Ojerinde SO. Brine shrimp toxicity of acidic fractions of Boswellia dalzielii gum resin. JPB. 2005;2:137–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kohounde MJ, Gbaguidi F, Agbani P, Ayedoun MA, Cazaux S, Bouajiala J. Chemical composition and biological activities of extracts and essentaial oil of Boswellia dalzielii leaves. Pharm Biol. 2017;55(1):33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Otitoju AP, Longdet IY, Alemika TE, Adegoke MA, Gota VP. Cytotoxic activity of Boswellia dalzielii (Hutch) stem bark extract against head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (AW8507 cell line). JPB. 2019;16(2):187–94.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multi threading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:445–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hanwell MD, Curtis DE, Lonie DC, Vandermeersch T, Zurek E, Hutchison GR. Avogadro : an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J cheminformatics. 2012;4(17):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Roy NK, Parama D, Banik K, Bordoloi D, Devi AK, Thakur KK, et al. An update on pharmacological potential of boswellic acids against chronic diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2019;4101 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2017410

  15. 15.

    Cummings J, Ward TH, Ranson M, Dive C. Apoptosis pathway-targeted drugs from the bench to the clinic. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1705:53–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Singh SK, Bhusari S, Singh R, Saxena A, Mondhe D. Effect of acetyl 11-keto β-boswellic acid on metastatic growth factor responsible for angiogenesis. Vascul Pharmacol. 2007;46:333–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kirste S, Treier M, Wehrle SJ, Becker G, Abdel-Tawab M, Gerbeth K, et al. Boswellia serrata acts on cerebral edema in patients irradiated for brain tumors. Cancer. 2011;117:3788–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Henkel A, Tausch L, Pillong M, Jauch J, Karas M, Schneider G, et al. Boswellic acids target the human immune system-modulating antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Pharmacol Res. 2015;102:53–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sanchez-Martinez C, Lallena MJ, Sanfeliciano SG, deDios A. Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors as anticancer drugs: recent advances (2015–2019). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019;29:126637

  20. 20.

    Lin SY, Makino K, Xia W, Matin A, Wen Y, Kwong KY, et al. Nuclear localization of EGF receptor and its potential new role as a transcription factor. Nat Cell Biol. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0901-802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sakurikar N, Eichhorn JM, Alford SE, Chambers TC. Identification of a mitotic death signature in cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2014;343:232–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhou L, Cai X, Han X, Xu N, Chang DC. CDK1 switches mitotic arrest to apoptosis by phosphorylating Bcl-2/Bax family proteins during treatment with microtubule interfering agents. Cell Biol Int. 2014;38:737–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the study or publication of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

APO designed the study and performed the experiment. IYL, VPG, and TEA analyzed and interpreted the data. APO and IYL were major contributors in writing the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akinbobola Peace Otitoju.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otitoju, A.P., Longdet, I.Y., Alemika, T.E. et al. Chloroform extract and acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid from Boswellia dalzielii stem bark induce apoptosis and cell cycle blockage in AW8507 cells. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 33, 20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-021-00075-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Boswellia dalzielii; HPLC–MS
  • Reverse virtual screening
  • Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid