- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Significance of OCT3/4 and SOX2 antigens expression by leukemic blast cells in adult acute leukemia
Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute volume 36, Article number: 5 (2024)
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to address the prognostic impact of SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression on adult acute leukemia patients’ outcomes.
Methods
SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression by blast cells were evaluated by flow cytometry in 80 acute leukemia patients and 8 healthy controls.
Results
Baseline SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression were significantly higher in both ALL (P = < 0.001, P = 0.005 respectively) and AML patients (P < 0.001, P = 0.003 respectively) as compared to control, and decline at complete remission (CR) and elevated again at relapse. High SOX2 and OCT3/4 levels were significantly correlated with the presence of adverse risk stratification parameters.
Conclusion
Our findings indicated that both SOX2 and OCT3/4 could serve as biomarkers that could improve risk stratification of acute leukemia patients. Also, both SOX2 and OCT3/4 might be a therapeutic target, especially in resistant acute leukemia.
Introduction
Acute leukemia (AL) is a clonal disease of hematopoietic stem cells in which uncontrolled cell expansion and differentiation occur. AL is classified according to the affected lineage into acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1]. AML is one of the aggressive malignant hematological disorders all over the world, accounting for 80–90% of adult acute leukemia, but only accounts for 15–20% of children’s leukemia. In 2022, the estimated number of new cases in the USA was 20,050 and the estimated number of deaths was 11,540 [2]. The aggressiveness of the disease is reflected by the 5-year survival rate of 30.5% based on data collected in the period, 2012–2018 [3].
ALL is more frequently reported in children. Its incidence is bimodal with the first beak in childhood (80% of ALL) and the second beak around age 50 [4]. In 2022, the estimated number of new cases was 6660 and the estimated number of deaths was 1560 in the USA [2]. Although children with ALL have 90% 5-year overall survival (OS), only 25% of older patients (more than 50 years old) were alive 5 years after diagnosis, thus emphasizing the need for further improvements in treatment for older patients [5].
The higher frequency of relapse, which had a negative impact on OS [6] had been attributed to a fraction of the leukemic population that re-expresses embryonic cell markers as Oct-3/4 and Sox2, which have a role in the activation of genes responsible for self-renewal and suppression of genes involved in cell differentiation [7].
SOX/Sox (SRY homology box) protein family composed of 20 members in man and mouse [8], the most explored of them is SOX2/Sox2 [9]. SOX2 regulates several features of cancer as proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, tumor initiation, cancer stem cell formation as well as resistance to apoptosis and therapy through cross-reacting with a variety of signaling pathways [10]. It was reported that SOX2-positive cells remain as a small population of multipotent stem and/or progenitor cells in the adult pituitary gland [11].
Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4, also known as OCT3 or OCT3/4) is a transcription factor that binds as an octamer. It was first discovered in 1989 [12], and its expression was observed in many sites as ovulated oocytes, early pre-implantation embryos, primitive ectoderm, the inner cell mass, ESCs, embryonic germ cells, and embryonic carcinoma cells [13, 14]. OCT3/4 acts as a transcription factors that contribute to carcinogenesis, tumor metastasis, and poor results [15]. It has been reported that OCT3/4 may be a therapeutic target, because the downregulation of OCT3/4 in cells leads to the loss of self-renewal and proliferation abilities, favoring the process of apoptosis in cancer cells [16]. Few previous studies have evaluated the expression of SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression in AML patients; however, no one study evaluated both antigens in adult ALL patients.
The aim of our study was to assess the impact of bone marrow blast cells SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression by blast cells on acute leukemia patients’ outcomes.
Material and methods
Subjects
This study included 80 newly diagnosed patients with acute leukemia (42 AML, 38 ALL) (28 females and 52 males) their median age is 39 years (age range 18 to 81 years); attending the outpatient clinic of our center during the period between January 2019 and January 2023. The follow-up was at first every few weeks and then every 3 months for 2 years. The bone marrow (BM) samples were collected from 8 healthy controls (BM donors) of matched age and gender. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board [MD.18.03.19.R1]. All patients participating in this study gave written informed consent according to the declaration of Helsinki.
Inclusion criteria
Newly diagnosed adult acute leukemia patients.
Exclusion criteria
Leukemic patients younger than 18 years; acute leukemia combined with other malignancies acute leukemia under therapy; secondary acute leukemia.
All patients’ clinical data, age, gender, and full hemogram were collected from patients’ medical records The diagnosis was based on FAB and 2016 WHO classification and confirmed by immunophenotyping using a mixture of monoclonal antibodies panel for acute leukemia and cytogenetic studies by FISH technique. A total number of 42 patients were classified as AML and 38 patients were classified as ALL. FAB subtypes of AML patients included M1-M2 (45.2%), M3 (9.5%), M4-5 (42.9%), and M7 (2.4%). ALL patients were categorized into B ALL (78.9%) and T ALL (21.1%). The patients were followed up for 24 months. During the follow-up period, we recorded that 59 patients achieved complete remission after induction treatment, and 19 patients developed relapse.
AML patients were treated with a cytarabine-based intensive chemotherapy regimen with different dosages during induction therapy based on performance status, while ALL patients were treated with pediatric-inspired protocol plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (only for Philadelphia chromosome-positive cases) and hyper-CVAD for adult patients. Relapsed/refractory cases were treated by either HAM (high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone) or FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, and G-CSF) protocol [17].
Response to treatment was categorized into 4 groups: complete response (CR); no circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis (TLH) and < 5% blasts, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1000/μL, platelets > 100,000/μL and no recurrence for 4 weeks. Refractory disease was a failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Induction death (ID) was defined as the occurrence of death during the induction phase. Hematological relapse was defined as a reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (> 5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. MRD detection was carried out at the following points: day 28 post-induction, every 3 months in the first year, and every 6 months in the 2nd year. Complete remission was defined by the presence of negative MRD [18].
Methods
Blast cells expression of SOX2 and OCT3/4 antigens were identified by flow cytometry
Bone marrow EDTA samples were processed within 2 h from sampling. Fresh bone marrow samples were processed as follows: 100 μl of the sample was added to 100 µl of cold Fixation Buffer (R1) and the mixture was vortexed. Blank and sample tubes were incubated at room temperature for 15 min in the dark, then washed with 2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), after the tubes were centrifuged at (1250–1500 rpm/350–500×g for 5 min) and the supernatant was decanted. One hundred microliters of Permeabilization buffer (R2) were added and incubated at room temperature for 5 min in the dark. Then, 10 µL of conjugated antibody SOX2 PE and OCT3/4 APC (R&D system, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) were added and vortexed. Tubes were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Two times washing was done using 2 ml of PBS. The cells were suspended in 300 µL PBS buffer for flow cytometric analysis. Acquisition of a minimum of 50,000 events was done employing (Navios EX Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter).
Initial gating was done using forward scatter area on X-axis versus forward scatter height on the Y-axis to include only singlet cells, then another gate was done using CD45 versus forward scatter (FSC) to exclude debris and dead cells. Then blast cell population were gated as low side scatter (SCC) in dim CD45, confirmed by expression of immature markers such as (CD34, CD117, HLA-DR, and CD99) that distinguished blast cells from maturing cells and calculated as a percentage of the total number of gated events. Assignment of blast lineage was assessed by different markers evaluated (CD34, CD117, HLA-DR, CD13, CD33, MPO, CD64, CD14, CD36, CD11b) for AML cases and CD19, CD10, CD20, cytoplasmic CD22, cytoplasmic CD79a, CD38, CD81, CD58, CD56 for B-ALL cases and cytoplasmic CD3, surface CD3, CD2, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD1a and CD99 for T-ALL cases (Table 1). Expression of SOX2 and OCT3/4 was assessed as a percentage of the blast cells in the plot displayed marker on X-axis versus side scatter (SSC) on Y-axis (Figs. 1 and 2).
The expression for OCT3/4 and SOX2 in normal lymphocytes gated in normal bone marrow samples was considered the cutoff level. The patients harboring expression levels above this cutoff were considered positive.
Isotype control (antimouse IgG1FITC/Ig2αPE) is used as a negative control for assessing blast cell expression to determine the degree of positivity of leukemic panels.
Normal bone marrow
Staining of bone marrow cells by a combined mixture of CD34/OCT3/4, or CD34/SOX2 to address and quantify CD34+ population expressing OCT3/4 and SOX2. Staining of the lymphocytes by OCT3/4 and SOX2 was used as a negative control [19].
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) program for Windows (Standard version 21). The normality of data was first tested with a one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Qualitative data were described using numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as median (min–max) for non-normal data. For comparing two groups Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric) was used and for more than two groups Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Wilcoxon test was used for comparing non-parametric data in one group. The ROC curve (receiver operating characteristic) was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity for quantitative diagnostic measures that categorize cases into one of two groups. AUC (area under the curve) is the area between the curve and the reference line, it represents how the model is capable of distinguishing between classes. Kaplan-Meier test was used for survival analysis and the statistical significance of differences among curves was determined by log-rank test. Cox’s proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting DFS and OS. For all the above-mentioned statistical tests done, the threshold of significance is fixed at a 5% level (p value). The results were considered significant when the p ≤ 0.05. The smaller the p value obtained, the more significant the results. The sample size was calculated using an online sample size calculator (https:// https://riskcalc.org/samplesize/) with an estimated mean of OCT-4 expression [20] and level of alpha error of 5% and study power of 95%. A minimal sample size required for the study is calculated to be 48 subjects. To account for possible drop out a total sample of 80 subjects in each group is initially planned to be included in the study.
Results
SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression in the studied patient
Levels of expression at diagnosis
Both ALL and AML groups had higher levels of SOX2 expression as compared to control (P < 0.001 for both) and OCT3/4 expression (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003 respectively) as compared to controls. No significant difference between ALL and AML patient groups was found with regard to SOX2 and OCT3/4 levels (P = 0.128, P = 0.832 respectively) (Table 2).
Levels of SOX2 and OCT3/ expression at remission
At bone marrow remission the expression levels of both SOX2 and OCT3/4 were significantly downregulated as compared to diagnosis levels and the differences were statistically significant in AML [for SOX2; P = < 0.001 and for OCT3/4; P = < 0.001] and in ALL group [for SOX2; P = < 0.001 and for OCT3/4; P = < 0.001] (Tables 3 and 4) (Fig. 3).
Levels of SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression at relapse
In the AML group; both SOX2 and OCT3/4 were elevated in relapse compared to their level at remission (P = 0.005, P = 0.005 respectively), also in the ALL group, relapsed cases had significantly higher SOX2 and OCT3/4 levels compared to remission (P = 0.008, P = 0.008 respectively) (Tables 3 and 4) (Fig. 3).
Impact of OCT3/4 and SOX2 expressions on acute leukemia patients’ outcome
ROC curve was used to evaluate the cut-off value of OCT3/4 and SOX2 as prognostic markers for survival in both ALL and AML. In ALL, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that SOX2 ≥ 16.3% and OCT3/4 ≥ 1.55% identified patients likely to experience death with AUC (area under the curve) of 0.763 (P value = 0.006) sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 66.7% and AUC of 0.758, (P value = 0.007), sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 71.4% respectively (Fig. 4A).
In AML, SOX2 ≥ 21.7% and OCT3/4 ≥ 1.65% identified patients likely to experience death with AUC of 0.854 (P value = < 0.001), sensitivity 88.0% and specificity 82.4% and AUC of 0.692 (P value = 0.037), sensitivity 68.0% and specificity 70.6% respectively (Fig. 4B).
Evaluation of OCT3/4 and SOX2 expression in relation to clinicopathological features
In ALL cases; both SOX2 and OCT3/4 markers were significantly elevated in unfavorable cytogenetic risk stratification compared to favorable risk stratification, in non-CR cases compared to CR cases, in relapsed cases compared to non-relapsed cases, and in dead patients compared to living patients. SOX2 was significantly elevated in T-ALL cases compared to B ALL cases (Table 5).
In AML cases, poor and intermediate cytogenetic risk stratification had higher SOX2 and OCT3/4 levels compared to favorable risk stratification, also in non-CR patients compared to patients achieved CR, in relapsed cases compared to non-relapsed cases, and in dead patients compared to living patients (Table 6).
Impact of OCT3/4 and SOX2 expression on OS and DFS
Based on ROC curve analysis the acute leukemia patients were classified into 2 groups, ALL patients with high SOX2 expression (16.3%) and OCT3/4 (1.55%) expression. Also, AML patients were classified as those with high SOX2 expression and low SOX2 expression and also those with high OCT3/4 expression and low OCT3/4 expression according to ROC curve cut-off value of SOX2 (21.7%) and a cut-off value of OCT3/4 (1.65%) expression.
Adult ALL patients expressed high SOX2 and OCT3/4 had significantly shorter OS and DFS as compared to those with low expression (P = 0.007; P = 0.016 respectively and P = 0.006 for SOX2) (Fig. 5). Moreover, AML, patients expressing high SOX2 and OCT3/4 had significantly shorter OS as compared to those with low SOX2 (P = < 0.001) and OCT3/4 expression (P = 0.022). As regards DFS, those with high SOX2 and OCT3/4 also had significantly shorter DFS than those with low SOX2 (P = 0.003) and OCT3/4 (< 0.001) (Fig. 6).
COX regression analysis to identify biological factors that could predict CR, OS, and DFS
COX regression analysis was conducted to predict factor (s) affecting OS and DFS using age, gender, laboratory data, type, risk stratification, response, SOX2, and OCT3/4 as covariates. In ALL cases; non-CR (P = 0.021), high SOX2 expression (P = 0.029) and high OCT3/4 expression (P = 0.018) were significant independent factors for shorter OS in ALL patients in multivariate analysis. Moreover, both high SOX2 expression (P = 0.001) and high OCT3/4 expression (P = 0.025) were significant independent factors for shorter DFS in ALL patients in multivariate analysis (Tables 7 and 8).
However, in AML cases; high SOX2 expression (P = 0.001) and high OCT3/4 expression (P = 0.045) were significant independent factors for shorter OS in AML patients in multivariate analysis. Moreover, both high SOX2 expression (P = 0.010) and high OCT3/4 expression (P = 0.023) were significant independent factors for shorter DFS in AML patients in multivariate analysis (Tables 9 and 10).
Discussion
SOX2 and OCT3/4 act as transcription factors that confer stemness characteristics to the cancer cells which contribute to tumorigenesis, cancer metastasis, and poor prognosis [13]. SOX2 protein binds firstly to the chromosome and provides a target for subsequent OCT3/4 binding [21, 22]. This complex binds to specific target genes in the nucleus, induces their expression, and maintains embryonic characteristics [20].
In the current study, SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression were significantly higher in AML at diagnosis as compared to normal control. In patients who achieved CR, levels of SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression declined to the control levels. At relapse, both SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression elevated again to the diagnosis levels. These results are in agreement with the findings reported in previous studies [6, 23, 24]. In this context, similar findings were reported by Zhao et al. [20], and Picot et al. [19] who studied OCT3/4 expression by flowcytometry in BM samples harvested from 103 AML patients at diagnosis, and 40 samples at complete remission and 10 BM samples from healthy donors.
To our knowledge, no previous study had assessed the level of SOX2 expression in adult ALL. In our study, both SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression were significantly elevated at diagnosis as compared to control levels. At the remission phase, both markers decline to the control levels. At ALL relapse the expression levels of both markers elevated again. These findings indicate an association between the presence of blast cells and SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression. The role of embryonic markers in leukemogenesis is still under investigation. Both OCT4 and SOX2 are two of Yamanaka’s factors, which can induce pluripotency in differentiated cells to make stem cells with embryonic properties as they act as core transcription factors in maintaining pluripotency [25]. The forced expression of OCT3/4 transdifferentiates skin fibroblasts into hematopoietic cells without going through a stage of embryonic stem cells [26]. Meanwhile, OCT4 targets stem cell-specific growth factor genes, so the aberrant expression of OCT4 in leukemic cells may result in appropriate activation of stem cell growth factors that promote cell proliferation and decrease apoptosis.
ROC curve was used to determine the best cutoff value that could discriminate between high and low expression of SOX2 and OCT3/4. Acute leukemia patients with high SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression levels in the acute leukemia subgroup of patients were significantly associated with adverse risk stratification, non-CR patients, relapsed cases, and dead cases. In the same line, Yin et al. [23] demonstrated that over-expression of OCT4 in AML patients correlated with abnormal karyotypes and higher risk stratification. Xiang et al. [6] stated that higher OCT4 expression was linked to poor risk stratification and no relation with other clinicopathological features was detected. Tosic et al. [24] noted none of the patients with higher SOX2 levels were found in the favorable prognostic group. Picot et al. [19] reported that no correlation was detected between levels of any ESCA in leukemic cells with any of biological characteristics.
Both AML and ALL patients expressing higher levels of SOX2 and OCT3/4 groups have shorter OS and DSF as compared to patients with lower expression levels. These results go in harmony with Yin et al. [23] noted that patients with OCT4 high expression have significantly shorter overall survival (OS) as compared to those with lower expression. These findings suggest that high OCT3/4 expression has an adverse event and a worse impact on the prognosis of AML. Xiang et al. [8] classified AML patients by median of OCT4 expression into high and low groups, assessed survival and DFS and found that patients with low expression have better OS. Tosic et al. [24] stated that AML patients who have high SOX2 expression levels displayed shortened both OS and DFS compared to those with lower ones. In contrast, Picot et al. [19] stated that AML patients with higher SOX2 levels were associated with better OS but the difference was not statistically significant.
Cox regression analysis revealed that both SOX2 and OCT3/4 expression are independent predictors of shorter OS and DFS in both ALL and AML patients. In the same line, Xiang et al. [6] stated that OCT4 high expression was an independent predictor factor for worse OS and DFS in AML patients, it was explained as OCT4 interacts with many signaling pathways such as JAK/STAT pathway that accelerate proliferation, invasion of leukemic cells and aggravation of disease progress resulting in worse DFS and OS. However, no previous research studied this issue in ALL patients.
Several studies explained the role of high SOX2 expression in chemotherapeutic resistance that terminally leads to clinical relapse, These include (1) activation of multi-drug resistance ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter genes that lead to drug removal out of tumor cells such as in glioblastoma [26]) and breast cancer [27]. (2) Upregulation of antiapoptotic factor named B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) in lung cancer [28] and downregulation of proapoptotic protein NOXA [29]. (3) Activation of multiple signaling pathways mediating resistance to therapy, i.e., (a) WNT/β catenin signaling results in the development of tamoxifen resistance to in breast cancer [30] b) PI3K/Akt signaling that induces chemoresistance in glioma by enhancing ABC activity. Moreover, these mechanisms were proved in an experimental study done by Mukherjee et al. [27] who found that the knockdown of SOX2 increased chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, the role of OCT3/4 overexpression in therapy resistance was declared by many studies [31,32,33,34] which mentioned the following mechanism: (1) OCT3/4 up-regulates miRNA-125 via interaction with its promoter, which acts as an oncogenic factor that inhibits apoptosis, (2) OCT3/4 regulates several signaling pathways as WNT/β catenin, JAK/STAT, and survivin/STAT3. OCT3/4 can regulate chemoradiation resistance and metastasis of hepatocellular adenocarcinoma through survivin/STAT3. Survivin plays a role in tumor progression by inhibition of apoptosis. OCT3/4 positively regulates survivin expression. (3) Higher expression of OCT3/4 enhances the activity of ABC in ovarian cancer that resists chemotherapy. Its role in drug resistance is proved by the knockdown of its expression, which increases sensitivity to chemotherapy and irradiation in lung cancer patients.
Both SOX2 and OCT3/4 could be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of high-risk acute leukemia patients especially those who experienced resistance to chemotherapy. In this context, both markers could be used in the risk stratification of acute leukemia patients.
Study limitations
Small number of normal bone marrow samples as well as a relatively small number of acute leukemia patients.
Conclusion
Our findings indicated that both SOX2 and OCT3/4 could serve as biomarkers that could improve risk stratification of acute leukemia patients. Also, both SOX2 and OCT3/4 might be a therapeutic target, especially in resistant acute leukemia.
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Abbreviations
- AML:
-
Acute myeloid leukemia
- ALL:
-
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- BCL2:
-
B cell lymphoma-2
- CD:
-
Cluster of differentiation
- CR:
-
Complete remission
- DFS:
-
Disease-free survival
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- OCT4:
-
Octamer-binding transcription factor 4
- PD:
-
Progressive course
- PFS:
-
Progression-free survival
- PR:
-
Partial remission
- SOX/Sox:
-
SRY homology box
References
Sas, V., Moisoiu, V., Teodorescu, P., et al. Approach to the adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient. J Clin Med.2019; 8(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081175.
Siegel, Rebecca L., Miller, Kimberly D., Fuchs, Hannah E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 72(1), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708.
National Cancer Institute. Cancer stat facts: leukemia-acute myeloid leukemia. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. 2021; https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/amyl.html.
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2014, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/ , based on November 2016 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2017.
Malard Florent. Mohty, Mohamad. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2020;395(10230):1146–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33018-1.
Xiang, Y., Zhou, X. Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 correlates with complex karyotype, FLT3-ITD mutation and poorer risk stratification, and predicts unfavourable prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Hematology, 23(10), 721-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/10245332.2018.1482050.
Walcher L, Kistenmacher AK, Suo H, et al. Cancer stem cells-origins and biomarkers: perspectives for targeted personalized therapies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01280.
Bowles J, Schepers G, Koopman P. Phylogeny of the SOX family of developmental transcription factors based on sequence and structural indicators. Dev Biol. 2000;227(2):239–55. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9883.
Schepers GE, Teasdale RD, Koopman P. Twenty pairs of sox: extent, homology, and nomenclature of the mouse and human sox transcription factor gene families. Dev Cell. 2002;3(2):167–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00223-x.
Hüser L, Novak D, Umansky V, et al. Targeting SOX2 in anticancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2018;22(12):983–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2018.1538359.
Fauquier T, Rizzoti K, Dattani M, et al. SOX2-expressing progenitor cells generate all of the major cell types in the adult mouse pituitary gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;105(8):2907–12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707886105.
Schöler HR, Hatzopoulos AK, Balling R, et al. A family of octamer-specific proteins present during mouse embryogenesis: evidence for germline-specific expression of an Oct factor. EMBO J. 1989;8(9):2543–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08392.x.
Clemente-Periván SI, Gómez-Gómez Y, Leyva-Vázquez MA, et al. Role of Oct3/4 in cervical cancer tumorigenesis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00247.
Howe M, Zhao J, Bodenburg Y, et al. Oct-4A isoform is expressed in human cord blood-derived CD133 stem cells and differentiated progeny. Cell Prolif. 2009;42(3):265–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.2009.00593.x.
Lathia JD, Liu H. Overview of cancer stem cells and stemness for community oncologists. Target Oncol. 2017;12(4):387–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-017-0508-3.
Mohiuddin IS, Wei SJ, Kang MH. Role of OCT4 in cancer stem-like cells and chemotherapy resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(4):165432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.03.005.
Rowe J. The, “7+3” regimen in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2022;107(1):3.
Heuser M, Freeman S, Ossenkoppele G, et al. 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood. 2021;138(26):2753–67. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021013626.
Picot T, Aanei CM, Fayard A, et al. Expression of embryonic stem cell markers in acute myeloid leukemia. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(7):1010428317716629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317716629.
Zhang S, Xiong X, Sun Y. Functional characterization of SOX2 as an anticancer target. Signal Transd Target Ther. 2020;5(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00242-3.
Fu TY, Hsieh IC, Cheng JT, et al. Association of OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG expression with oral squamous cell carcinoma progression. J Oral Pathol Med. 2016;45(2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12335.
Pan X, Cang X, Dan S, et al. Site-specific disruption of the Oct4/Sox2 protein interaction reveals coordinated mesendodermal differentiation and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(35):18353–69. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.745414.
Yin JY, Tang Q, Zhai LL, et al. High expression of OCT4 is frequent and may cause undesirable treatment outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(12):9711–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3731-5.
Tosic N, Petrovic I, Grujicic NK, et al. Prognostic significance of SOX2, SOX3, SOX11, SOX14 and SOX18 gene expression in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2018;67:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2018.02.001.
Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024.
Jeon HM, Sohn YW, Oh SY, et al. ID4 imparts chemoresistance and cancer stemness to glioma cells by derepressing miR-9*-mediated suppression of SOX2. Cancer Res. 2011;71(9):3410–21.
Mukherjee, P., Gupta, A., Chattopadhyay, et al. Modulation of SOX2 expression delineates an end-point for paclitaxel-effectiveness in breast cancer stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):9170.
Chou YT, Lee CC, Hsiao SH, et al. The emerging role of SOX2 in cell proliferation and survival and its crosstalk with oncogenic signaling in lung cancer. Stem Cells. 2013;31(12):2607–19.
Bareiss PM, Paczulla A, Wang H, et al. SOX2 expression associates with stem cell state in human ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2013;73(17):5544–55.
Piva M, Domenici G, Iriondo O, et al. Sox2 promotes tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6(1):66–79.
Wang YD, Cai N, Wu XL, et al. OCT4 promotes tumorigenesis and inhibits apoptosis of cervical cancer cells by miR-125b/BAK1 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4(8):e760.
Wang G, Zhou H, Gu Z, et al. Oct4 promotes cancer cell proliferation and migration and leads to poor prognosis associated with the survivin/STAT3 pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2018;40(2):979–87.
Cioffi M, D’Alterio C, Camerlingo R, et al. Identification of a distinct population of CD133(+)CXCR4(+) cancer stem cells in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10357.
Cortes-Dericks L, Yazd EF, Mowla SJ, et al. Suppression of OCT4B enhances sensitivity of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells to cisplatin via increased apoptosis. Anticancer Res. 2013;33(12):5365–73.
Acknowledgements
We deeply acknowledge all technicians in Mansoura University Oncology Center laboratories as well as patients included in this study.
Funding
The authors deny any financial support in the production of research or publication
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SA and NE established the study design, provided the research strategy, and supervised the overall research plan. OK and NK performed the experiments. EA, MA, and OS interpreted the data and provided scientific and statistical analysis. OK, MA, and NA prepared and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The current study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the medical ethics committee and scientific ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University. Written informed consent was given by all the subjects included in this study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aref, S., Khaled, O., Menshawy, N.E. et al. Significance of OCT3/4 and SOX2 antigens expression by leukemic blast cells in adult acute leukemia. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 36, 5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-024-00209-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-024-00209-3